Mahindra Navrat Sadahalli Floor Plans

Note the tower lettering skips "I". It runs A to H, then J and K. That is what the filing says.

Why the 150 sq m line exists at all. It is not a product decision, and reading it as one is the most common mistake made with this filing. It is a parking threshold. The application's own parking computation applies one car to each of the 1,078 homes in the 50 to 150 sq m band and two cars to each of the 88 homes above it, then adds 117 visitor bays, 32 for the clubhouses and 54 for the commercial block to reach the 1,457 requirement. The split exists because the parking norm changes at 150 sq m — which is also why it is the one place the filing distinguishes the two unit classes at all, and why it does so twice with the same counts.

That second appearance is what makes 88 worth leaning on. A number that survives independently in a unit schedule and in a parking calculation is a real configuration count, not a rounding.

One number not to divide. The 2.49 million sq ft of built-up area covers two basement levels beneath every tower, a Ground plus 3 commercial block, two clubhouses, services and circulation alongside the homes. Dividing it by 1,166 gives about 2,137 sq ft, and that figure is an artefact, not an average apartment. Anyone quoting an average unit size for Mahindra Navrat Sadahalli derived that way is quoting the basements.

Indicative only. No configuration below has been announced, and every Mahindra Sadahalli unit size on this page is derived rather than sourced. The area bands in the filing are the sourced numbers; these are the working view drawn from them.

Mahindra Lifespaces has not published a price for Mahindra Navrat Sadahalli. The indicative band shown here — approximately Rs 12,000 to Rs 13,200 per sq ft — is our own inference from the gross development value the developer itself disclosed for this land and from verified launch rates at comparable projects in the same belt. It is not a quoted price and it is not a price list. All-in figures are rate multiplied by size plus 5% GST; Karnataka stamp duty and registration of about 6.6% are extra. The smallest configuration carries the highest rate per sq ft and the largest the lowest, which is the standard taper in this market.

The full derivation of the rate band, including the cross-check against the developer's disclosed gross development value, sits on the price page.

This is the core of the project and the highest-confidence row on the page. It sits directly across the derived 1,415 to 1,518 sq ft average, which is what a three-bedroom-led mix looks like arithmetically, and it is the band the belt's ready stock already trades in.

At 1,500 to 1,600 sq ft the plan supports three bedrooms with two or three bathrooms, a separate dining area and a utility balcony. Between 1,650 and 1,750 sq ft it becomes a master suite with a dressing zone, a third bedroom that genuinely works as a study, and a wider living frontage onto whichever aspect the tower faces.

The buyer profile is an owner-occupier relocating into North Bengaluru for the long term. It is also the configuration with the most rental evidence behind it: in this same village, completed branded three-bedroom stock of roughly 1,460 to 1,535 sq ft lets at Rs 35,000 to Rs 42,000 a month, or about Rs 24 to Rs 27 per sq ft per month. That is a rare thing to have in a pre-approval market — a real, local, like-for-like rent observation rather than a corridor average.

Measured against the wider set of 3 BHK apartments in North Bangalore, this size band is unremarkable. What is not unremarkable is the plate it sits on, and that is where the comparison should be made.

This is the only configuration with a genuine count behind it. The filing records 88 homes above 150 sq m and provisions two car parks for each of them, and both statements survive independently in the same document. A top tier of roughly 88 homes is therefore the most secure structural fact on this page after the total.

Worth noting as arithmetic rather than as a claim: 88 is exactly four times the 22 upper floors. The two most economical ways to build 88 large homes into this structure are one per floor across four towers, or four per floor in one. That may be coincidence, and no document says which — but it is the kind of pattern a buyer should test against the first tower plan that appears.

The size band is wide on purpose, and the reason is the sharpest open question in the filing. The application does not state whether its 150 sq m threshold is carpet area or built-up area, and the answer moves the band materially. Read as carpet, more than 1,615 sq ft of carpet implies roughly 2,150 sq ft super built-up at 25% loading and about 2,480 sq ft at 35%. Read as built-up, it implies roughly 2,020 sq ft saleable at 80% efficiency. Our 2,150 to 2,500 band is drawn wide enough to hold both readings, and it should be narrowed the moment a floor plan or a RERA filing settles the question. Anyone publishing a single precise four-bedroom size for this project has resolved an ambiguity the source document does not resolve.

The buyer profile is a large family or a second-home purchase where the two-car provision matters as much as the fourth bedroom.

The residential built form is 2 basements plus ground plus 22 upper floors across all ten towers. The second clubhouse repeats it at a smaller scale with its own two basement levels plus ground plus one upper floor, while the first clubhouse is arranged as lower ground plus ground plus one upper. The commercial block is Ground plus 3 at 14.95 m.

The reason the basements go two levels deep is visible in the site arithmetic. Buildings cover only 15.34% of the net site and landscape takes 56.49% of it, so with about one-seventh of the ground under building footprint and more than half of it planted, parking has to go down rather than spread out.

The surface figures confirm it. Only 3,300 sq m is given to surface parking, which on any normal aisle-inclusive allowance of 25 to 30 sq m per bay is of the order of 110 to 130 cars — a small fraction of the 1,588 bays provided. That is arithmetic on the filed areas, not a bay count from a drawing; no basement bay count is published. The provision itself runs 131 bays ahead of the 1,457 requirement, a surplus rather than a shortfall, and worth checking against the eventual allotment terms.

One filed commitment reaches inside the apartment. The application commits treated water from the on-site sewage treatment plant to flushing, gardening, vehicle washing and floor washing. Reuse for flushing means a second water network running to every cistern in every home — a separate riser and a separate set of points that any eventual plan has to accommodate. On the plant itself, the Terms of Reference resource table states an 830 KLD sewage treatment plant while the final site plan shows 850 KLD, a discrepancy inside the same filing which we report as it stands rather than reconcile.

No finish schedule exists for Mahindra Navrat Sadahalli. Flooring, joinery, sanitaryware, counter materials, brand names and fittings have not been published. Any specification list circulating for this project has been assembled from other projects and should be treated as such.

What does exist is a performance envelope on a government filing, which is more than most pre-launch projects can show. The application records a connected load of 8,225 kVA from BESCOM with 500 kVA × 4 of backup generation, an organic waste converter rated at 1,275 kg/day against 3,171 kg/day of solid waste, roof-water sumps, a storm-water sump and 80 recharge pits, and solar photovoltaics proposed in the environmental-management documentation. The backup provision is worth reading closely: 2,000 kVA against an 8,225 kVA connected load is about 24%, which is an essential-services and common-area backup rather than full-load power to every apartment. That distinction is worth confirming in writing before it becomes a disappointment.

For the fit-out itself, the fairest available guide is what the developer has actually specified elsewhere rather than any claim about this project. Every Bengaluru launch this company has made in the last decade has gone to market carrying a green certification or a pre-certification, which tells a buyer something useful about the envelope, the glazing and the services likely to be specified here — and nothing at all about the flooring or the joinery. The builder page lists the certifications and the bodies behind them. That is a portfolio record, not a certificate for Mahindra Navrat Sadahalli. No green certification has been issued to this project, and none can be until it is designed, approved and built.